The Lincoln Social Computing Research Centre have created two games that are being used to research social behaviour on Facebook.
Familiars is a game that finds out what your “animal companion” would be based on your Facebook activity
Magpies is a game about collecting interesting things and sharing your collections with others.
Both games are free to use and completely open to all Facebook users, so please pass on this invitation to anyone you think would be interested.
For more information, please contact Shaun Lawson or Ben Kirman.
The games have been developed by the Lincoln Social Computing Research Centre (LiSC) within the Faculty of Media, Humanities & Technology as part of the PASION project. PASION (Psychologically Augmented Social Interactions Over Networks) is a major European project involving the University of Lincoln and 17 other partner organisations that is investigating the social aspects of communication that is mediated by technology.
Recent Learning Lab activity
Back in November, I posted a six month round up of Learning Lab activity. Here is a round up of the work I’ve been doing since then.
I hope to contribute to this process by bringing staff and students together to talk about blogging and working and living on the web.
Looking back at the first six-month round-up, it’s good to see there is quite a lot of continuation and development of work started almost a year ago. WordPress has provided a focus to my work on the Learning Lab, but I’ve intentionally tried to ensure that it did not blinker my vision of available technologies either. Of the work mentioned on the previous update, a few items have been dropped or mutated. The Library blogs are now running on the main university WPMU platform rather than a separate installation. I have dropped bbPress for the time being, partly because integration with WPMU and BuddyPress was quite fragile but also because I’m not convinced we need to run our own discussion forum at the university.
Increasingly, I’m recommending that people use third-party services as there are some good products available for free or at little cost and the notion of the institution providing and controlling the use of technology is rapidly falling out of fashion. It’s a web 2.0, user-centric world, after all.
The Community Guidelines have been accepted as a useful and necessary addition to university guidance and policy and I have worked with the ICT department on ensuring that the use of Web 2.0 applications hosted by the university are covered in the university’s Acceptable Use Policy. I was also instrumental in writing the Notice and Take Down Policy which has been recently approved. These cover a lot of the applications I run on the Learning Lab as well as the Institutional Repository, which I also work on.
Support is still something I need to work on. I mentioned this in November and have spent time discussing this with colleagues working in the ICT support team. My efforts remain a mixture of classroom visits, training workshops, documentation and a fairly hard rule that people should learn to help themselves whenever possible. I was pleased to see Nick Jackson, a student rep, set up a Get Satisfaction site and will certainly participate there. Hopefully, other colleagues will get involved, too.
I continue to work on the Lincoln Academic Commons and this has recently contributed to us winning funding for Chemistry.FM, another JISC-funded project which I am managing. Among the outcomes of this project, I hope that I’ll be able to contribute to the second CERD book, which we’re currently putting a proposal together for. In my work on the Commons, I am still secretary to the Steering Group for the Institutional Repository and provide support to Neo, the forthcoming student journal and the Occasional Working Paper Series. Both Neo and OWPS, run on the Learning Lab using the Open Journal Systems.
Finally, I notice that I included ‘microblogging’ among the things I intended to look at following my round-up in November. This is an interesting case where microblogging, in my case Twitter, has become so embedded in my daily work that I no longer think of it as something that requires experimentation or evaluation. Of course, the use of Twitter and other microblogging platforms is still fairly new in education, but it no longer feels like a technology project. Success! I am following the development of Laconica, the open source alternative to Twitter and am running it on a server but it still feels too early in its development to devote too much time to it and given the popularity of Twitter I’m not sure what else I could offer by hosting Laconica on the Learning Lab. Personally, I am more interested in considering the use of FriendFeed in education and look forward to Google’s release of Wave. Both of these services, have the potential to change much of the way we communicate, identify ourselves and work on the web.
Now, there’s a statement to end with!